---
canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/research/best-practices-in-labour-market-information-recommendations-for-canadas-lmi-system/"
title: "Best Practices in Labour Market Information: Recommendations for Canada&#8217;s LMI System"
author:
  name: "CSLS"
  url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/"
date_published: "2026-07-02T13:33:13+00:00"
date_modified: "2026-07-07T08:15:06+00:00"
post_type: "research"
summary: ""
post_tag:
  - "best practices"
  - "Canada"
  - "data gaps"
  - "dissemination"
  - "forecasting"
  - "labour market information"
  - "LMI"
  - "recommendations"
country_focus:
  - "Canada"
province_region:
  - "National"
research_theme:
  - "Labour Markets"
featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/old-reports_hero_banner_bg.webp"
status: "publish"
---

# Best Practices in Labour Market Information: Recommendations for Canada’s LMI System

Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/research/best-practices-in-labour-market-information-recommendations-for-canadas-lmi-system/

# Best Practices in Labour Market Information: Recommendations for Canada’s LMI System

[Download full PDF report](https://csls.ca/pdf/csls2009-05.pdf)

Cite this report

×
Cite this report as:

Sharpe, Andrew. 2009. “Best Practices in Labour Market Information: Recommendations for Canada’s LMI System.” CSLS Research Report 2009-05. Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards. https://csls.ca/research/best-practices-in-labour-market-information-recommendations-for-canadas-lmi-system/

## Author:

-
Andrew Sharpe
Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

## Report 2009-05

July 2009 55 pages

## Related research

[Measuring the Appropriate Outcomes for Better Decision-Making: A Framework to Guide the Analysis of Health Policy

Matthew Calver

March 2016 | Report 2016-03 | 132 pages](https://csls.ca/research/measuring-the-appropriate-outcomes-for-better-decision-making-a-framework-to-guide-the-analysis-of-health-policy-2016-03/)
[Living Standards Domain of the Canadian Index of Wellbeing

Andrew Sharpe, Christopher Ross

November 2011 | Report 2011-17 | 124 pages](https://csls.ca/research/living-standards-domain-of-the-canadian-index-of-wellbeing-2011-17/)

[Productivity: Key to Economic Success

Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

March 1998 | Report 1998-01 | 99 pages](https://csls.ca/research/productivity-key-to-economic-success/)
[Apprenticeship in Canada:
A Training System Under Siege?

Andrew Sharpe

December 1999 | Report 1999-03 | 59 pages](https://csls.ca/research/apprenticeship-in-canadaa-training-system-under-siege/)

[A Survey of Indicators of Economic and Social Well-being

Andrew Sharpe

July 1999 | Report 1999-cprn | 72 pages](https://csls.ca/research/a-survey-of-indicators-of-economic-and-social-well-being/)
[Creating a More Efficient Labour Market

Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

June 2001 | Report 2001-02 | 147 pages](https://csls.ca/research/creating-a-more-efficient-labour-market/)

[The Impact of the National Child Benefit Supplement on the Low Income Status of Canadian Families with Children: The SPSD/M Results

Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

June 2002 | Report 2002-01 | 59 pages](https://csls.ca/research/the-impact-of-the-national-child-benefit-supplement-on-the-low-income-status-of-canadian-families-with-children-the-spsd-m-results/)
[Productivity Trends in Natural Resources Industries in Canada

Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

February 2003 | Report 2003-01a | 69 pages](https://csls.ca/research/productivity-trends-in-natural-resources-industries-in-canada/)

[Productivity in the Forest Products Sector: A Review of the Literature

Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

February 2003 | Report 2003-02 | 28 pages](https://csls.ca/research/productivity-in-the-forest-products-sector-a-review-of-the-literature/)
[An Analysis of Productivity Trends in the Forest Products Sector in Canada

Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS)

February 2003 | Report 2003-01b | 64 pages](https://csls.ca/research/an-analysis-of-productivity-trends-in-the-forest-products-sector-in-canada/)

## Abstract

## Résumé

EN
FR

Copy link

Email

LinkedIn

The objective of this report for the LMI High-Level Advisory Panel is to provide advice on best practices in LMI and policy suggestions to improve the Canadian LMI system. Based on a thorough analysis, it presents 20 recommendations to improve the operation of LMI in Canada in the areas of LMI data, LMI analysis and forecasting, and LMI dissemination. For these recommendations to have traction, two conditions are needed. First, it is crucial that senior policy makers, that is those at the Deputy Minister and Ministerial level, recognize the important on an effective LMI system for a highperformance economy. Second, it is extremely important that jurisdictional issues do not become a barrier to the provision of high-quality LMI to the public.

L’objectif de ce rapport, préparé pour le Groupe consultatif de haut niveau sur l’IMT, est de présenter des conseils sur les pratiques exemplaires en matière d’information sur le marché du travail (IMT) et des suggestions politiques pour améliorer le système d’IMT du Canada. À partir d’une analyse approfondie, il présente 20 recommandations pour améliorer le fonctionnement de l’IMT au Canada dans les domaines des données d’IMT, de l’analyse et des prévisions de l’IMT, et de la diffusion de l’IMT. Pour que ces recommandations aient une portée réelle, deux conditions sont nécessaires. Premièrement, il est essentiel que les hauts décideurs, c’est-à-dire ceux qui occupent des postes de sous-ministre et de ministre, reconnaissent l’importance d’un système d’IMT efficace pour une économie performante. Deuxièmement, il est extrêmement important que les enjeux de compétence ne deviennent pas un obstacle à la prestation d’une IMT de grande qualité au public.

[Download full PDF report](https://csls.ca/pdf/csls2009-05.pdf)
