---
canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/issue-2/the-importance-of-innovation-for-productivity/"
title: "The Importance of Innovation for Productivity"
author:
  name: "CSLS"
  url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/"
date_published: "2026-07-10T09:12:58+00:00"
date_modified: "2026-07-13T06:38:08+00:00"
post_type: "ipm"
summary: ""
ipm_issue_period:
  - "Spring 2001"
ipm_keyword:
  - "Canada"
  - "G-7"
  - "human capital"
  - "income gap"
  - "innovation"
  - "intellectual property"
  - "manufacturing"
  - "OECD"
  - "productivity"
  - "R&amp;D"
  - "United States"
ipm_research_theme:
  - "Policy and institutions"
  - "Technology and innovation"
ipm_country_focus:
  - "Canada"
  - "OECD"
  - "United States"
featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp"
status: "publish"
---

# The Importance of Innovation for Productivity

Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/issue-2/the-importance-of-innovation-for-productivity/

# The Importance of Innovation for Productivity

[Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-2-2-Rao-Ahmad-Horsman-Kaptein-Russell.pdf)

Cite this article

×
Cite this article as:

Rao, Someshwar, Ashfaq Ahmad, William Horsman, and Phaedra Kaptein-Russell. 2001. “The Importance of Innovation for Productivity.” International Productivity Monitor, No. 2 (Spring 2001): 11–18. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/issue-2/the-importance-of-innovation-for-productivity/

## Authors:

-
Someshwar Rao
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

-
Ashfaq Ahmad
Micro-Economic Policy Analysis Branch, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

-
William Horsman
Micro-Economic Policy Analysis Branch, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

-
Phaedra Kaptein-Russell
Micro-Economic Policy Analysis Branch, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada

## IPM Issue 2

Spring 2001 pp. 11–18

## Related IPM articles

[Is the SNA Still Useful? A Review Article on The Measure of Progress: Counting What Really Matters

Paul Schreyer

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 116–124](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/is-the-sna-still-useful-a-review-article-on-the-measure-of-progress-counting-what-really-matters/)
[The Relationship between Efficiencies Defenses for Mergers and TFP Growth

Robin Shaban

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 82–102](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-relationship-between-efficiencies-defenses-for-mergers-and-tfp-growth/)

[Appendix: Variable Definitions and Country/Sector Coverage for Regulatory Reform Analysis

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 1–18](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/appendix-variable-definitions-and-country-sector-coverage-for-regulatory-reform-analysis/)
[Adult Skills and Productivity: New Evidence from PIAAC 2023

Dan Andrews, Balázs Égert, Christine de La Maisonneuve

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 41–63](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/adult-skills-and-productivity-new-evidence-from-piaac-2023/)

[The Potential Impact of Pro-competitive Regulatory Reforms on Productivity and Growth in Canada

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 3–40](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-potential-impact-of-pro-competitive-regulatory-reforms-on-productivity-and-growth-in-canada/)
[IPM Issue 49 Editors’ Overview

Andrew Sharpe, Bart van Ark, Paul Schreyer

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 1–2](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/)

[De-industrialization and the Great Productivity Slowdown: What Comes Next?

Paul Fisher

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 115–138](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/de-industrialization-and-the-great-productivity-slowdown-what-comes-next/)
[Appendix: UK Productivity Growth Rates Across Data Vintages and Studies

Josh Martin

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 65–73](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/appendix-uk-productivity-growth-rates-across-data-vintages-and-studies/)

[Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Productivity

Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Katharina Laengle, Matthias Schief, Filiz Unsal

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–26](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/opportunities-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-for-productivity/)
[Using Ecosystem Accounting to Integrate the Environment in Measures of Multifactor Productivity

Carl Obst

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 87–108](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/using-ecosystem-accounting-to-integrate-the-environment-in-measures-of-multifactor-productivity/)

## Abstract

## Résumé

EN
FR

Copy link

Email

LinkedIn

This article examines the linkages between innovation, productivity growth, and real incomes across OECD countries and within Canadian and U.S. manufacturing industries. It identifies Canada’s innovation gap relative to the United States and other G-7 countries, reviewing key drivers of innovation including R&D spending, human capital, intellectual property protection, and openness to trade. The paper argues that innovation—broadly conceived as advances in products, processes, and organizational practices—is the primary driver of long-run productivity growth and income improvement, and examines the appropriate role of government policy in closing Canada’s innovation gap.

Cet article examine les liens entre l’innovation, la croissance de la productivité et les revenus réels dans les pays de l’OCDE et au sein des industries manufacturières canadiennes et américaines. Il cerne l’écart d’innovation du Canada par rapport aux États-Unis et aux autres pays du G7, en passant en revue les principaux facteurs déterminants de l’innovation, notamment les dépenses en R-D, le capital humain, la protection de la propriété intellectuelle et l’ouverture au commerce. L’article soutient que l’innovation — conçue au sens large comme les progrès réalisés dans les produits, les procédés et les pratiques organisationnelles — est le principal moteur de la croissance de la productivité à long terme et de l’amélioration des revenus, et examine le rôle approprié des politiques gouvernementales pour combler le retard d’innovation du Canada.

[Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-2-2-Rao-Ahmad-Horsman-Kaptein-Russell.pdf)
