--- canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-43/productivity-growth-and-spillovers-across-european-and-american-industries-a-global-value-perspective-based-on-eu-klems/" title: "Productivity Growth and Spillovers across European and American Industries: A Global Value Perspective Based on EU KLEMS" author: name: "CSLS" url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/" date_published: "2026-07-13T08:14:51+00:00" date_modified: "2026-07-13T08:14:51+00:00" post_type: "ipm" summary: "" ipm_issue_period: - "Fall 2022" ipm_keyword: - "10 EU countries" - "EU KLEMS" - "Europe" - "frontier" - "Germany" - "GVC" - "input-output" - "Nankai" - "Rice" - "spatial model" - "TFP spillovers" - "United States" ipm_research_theme: - "Productivity trends and comparisons" - "Trade" ipm_country_focus: - "Europe" - "International" - "United States" featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp" status: "publish" --- # Productivity Growth and Spillovers across European and American Industries: A Global Value Perspective Based on EU KLEMS Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-43/productivity-growth-and-spillovers-across-european-and-american-industries-a-global-value-perspective-based-on-eu-klems/ # Productivity Growth and Spillovers across European and American Industries: A Global Value Perspective Based on EU KLEMS [Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-43-6-Liu-Cheng-Sickles.pdf) Cite this article × Cite this article as: Liu, Weilin, Qian Cheng, and Robin Sickles. 2022. “Productivity Growth and Spillovers across European and American Industries: A Global Value Perspective Based on EU KLEMS.” International Productivity Monitor, No. 43 (Fall 2022): 86–109. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-43/productivity-growth-and-spillovers-across-european-and-american-industries-a-global-value-perspective-based-on-eu-klems/ ## Authors: - Weilin Liu Nankai University; Rice University - Qian Cheng Nankai University; Rice University - Robin Sickles Rice University ## IPM Issue 43 Fall 2022 pp. 86–109 ## Related IPM articles [De-industrialization and the Great Productivity Slowdown: What Comes Next? Paul Fisher Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 115–138](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/de-industrialization-and-the-great-productivity-slowdown-what-comes-next/) [Are Intangibles Running out of Steam? Bart van Ark, Klaas de Vries, Abdul Erumban Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 38–59](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/are-intangibles-running-out-of-steam/) [Cracking the Productivity Code: An International Comparison of UK Productivity John Van Reenen, Xuyi Yang Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 60–82](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/cracking-the-productivity-code-an-international-comparison-of-uk-productivity/) [Appendix: EUKLEMS & INTANProd Industry Coverage and Intangible Asset Treatment Filippo Bontadini, Carol Corrado, Jonathan Haskel, Massimiliano Iommi, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, Tsutomu Miyagawa Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 1–4](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/appendix-euklems-intanprod-industry-coverage-and-intangible-asset-treatment/) [Intangible Capital, TFP Growth and Green Shoots in New Productivity Data Filippo Bontadini, Carol Corrado, Jonathan Haskel, Massimiliano Iommi, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, Tsutomu Miyagawa Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 3–37](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/intangible-capital-tfp-growth-and-green-shoots-in-new-productivity-data/) [IPM Issue 46 Editors’ Overview Andrew Sharpe, Bart van Ark Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 1–2](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/) [Capacity Utilization and Production Function Estimation: Implications for Productivity Analysis Jianmin Tang, Weimin Wang Fall 2023 | IPM Issue 45 | pp. 178–199](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-45/capacity-utilization-and-production-function-estimation-implications-for-productivity-analysis/) [The Post-2001 Productivity Growth Divergence between Canada and the United States Wulong Gu, Michael Willox Fall 2023 | IPM Issue 45 | pp. 28–60](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-45/the-post-2001-productivity-growth-divergence-between-canada-and-the-united-states/) [Lessons from a Career in Productivity Research: Some Answers, A Glimpse of the Future, and Much Left to Learn Martin Baily Spring 2023 | IPM Issue 44 | pp. 120–149](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-44/lessons-from-a-career-in-productivity-research-some-answers-a-glimpse-of-the-future-and-much-left-to-learn/) [Capital Measurement and Productivity Growth Across International Databases Reitze Gouma, Robert Inklaar Spring 2023 | IPM Issue 44 | pp. 67–88](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-44/capital-measurement-and-productivity-growth-across-international-databases/) ## Abstract ## Résumé EN FR Copy link Email LinkedIn Using a spatial production model with technological spillovers and GVC linkages from inter-country input-output tables, this article estimates TFP growth and its spillovers across 10 EU member states and the U.S. (EU KLEMS 2017, 31 ISIC industries). Spillover effects from intermediate inputs are significant. About 27 per cent of the productivity spillover embodied in intermediate inputs transmits across borders. Germany offers the most network effects within Europe, followed by the Netherlands, Czech Republic, and Sweden. À l’aide d’un modèle de production spatiale avec des retombées technologiques et des liens de CVM issus de tableaux mondiaux des entrées-sorties, cet article estime la croissance de la PMF et ses retombées dans 10 États membres de l’UE et les États-Unis (EU KLEMS 2017, 31 industries CITI). Les effets de retombées des intrants intermédiaires sont significatifs. Environ 27 % des retombées de productivité contenues dans les intrants intermédiaires se transmettent au-delà des frontières. L’Allemagne offre le plus d’effets de réseau au sein de l’Europe, suivie des Pays-Bas, de la République tchèque et de la Suède. [Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-43-6-Liu-Cheng-Sickles.pdf)