---
canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-43/a-measure-of-well-being-efficiency-based-on-the-world-happiness-report/"
title: "A Measure of Well-being Efficiency Based on the World Happiness Report"
author:
  name: "CSLS"
  url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/"
date_published: "2026-07-13T08:02:06+00:00"
date_modified: "2026-07-13T08:02:06+00:00"
post_type: "ipm"
summary: ""
ipm_issue_period:
  - "Fall 2022"
ipm_keyword:
  - "126 countries"
  - "Cantril ladder"
  - "DEA"
  - "Luxembourg"
  - "Nordic"
  - "STATEC"
  - "subjective well-being"
  - "TFP"
  - "well-being efficiency"
  - "World Happiness Report"
ipm_research_theme:
  - "Well-being and living standards"
ipm_country_focus:
  - "International"
featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp"
status: "publish"
---

# A Measure of Well-being Efficiency Based on the World Happiness Report

Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-43/a-measure-of-well-being-efficiency-based-on-the-world-happiness-report/

# A Measure of Well-being Efficiency Based on the World Happiness Report

[Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-43-2-Sarracino-O_Connor.pdf)

Cite this article

×
Cite this article as:

Sarracino, Francesco, and Kelsey O’Connor. 2022. “A Measure of Well-being Efficiency Based on the World Happiness Report.” International Productivity Monitor, No. 43 (Fall 2022): 10–40. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-43/a-measure-of-well-being-efficiency-based-on-the-world-happiness-report/

## Authors:

-
Francesco Sarracino
STATEC Research

-
Kelsey O’Connor
STATEC Research

## IPM Issue 43

Fall 2022 pp. 10–40

## Related IPM articles

[Efficiency Adjustment of Hours Worked: Two Possible Modifications of a Jorgensen Production Model

Barbara Fraumeni

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 103–115](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/efficiency-adjustment-of-hours-worked-two-possible-modifications-of-a-jorgensen-production-model/)
[Labour Productivity as a Measure of Technological Change

Ulrich Kohli

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 64–81](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/labour-productivity-as-a-measure-of-technological-change/)

[The Relationship between Efficiencies Defenses for Mergers and TFP Growth

Robin Shaban

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 82–102](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-relationship-between-efficiencies-defenses-for-mergers-and-tfp-growth/)
[IPM Issue 49 Editors’ Overview

Andrew Sharpe, Bart van Ark, Paul Schreyer

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 1–2](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/)

[The UK Productivity Slowdown: A Review of Timing, Magnitude, and Drivers

Josh Martin

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–34](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/the-uk-productivity-slowdown-a-review-of-timing-magnitude-and-drivers/)
[Appendix: UK Productivity Growth Rates Across Data Vintages and Studies

Josh Martin

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 65–73](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/appendix-uk-productivity-growth-rates-across-data-vintages-and-studies/)

[Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Productivity

Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Katharina Laengle, Matthias Schief, Filiz Unsal

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–26](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/opportunities-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-for-productivity/)
[Cracking the Productivity Code: An International Comparison of UK Productivity

John Van Reenen, Xuyi Yang

Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 60–82](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/cracking-the-productivity-code-an-international-comparison-of-uk-productivity/)

[Appendix: EUKLEMS & INTANProd Industry Coverage and Intangible Asset Treatment

Filippo Bontadini, Carol Corrado, Jonathan Haskel, Massimiliano Iommi, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, Tsutomu Miyagawa

Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 1–4](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/appendix-euklems-intanprod-industry-coverage-and-intangible-asset-treatment/)
[Intangible Capital, TFP Growth and Green Shoots in New Productivity Data

Filippo Bontadini, Carol Corrado, Jonathan Haskel, Massimiliano Iommi, Cecilia Jona-Lasinio, Tsutomu Miyagawa

Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 3–37](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/intangible-capital-tfp-growth-and-green-shoots-in-new-productivity-data/)

## Abstract

## Résumé

EN
FR

Copy link

Email

LinkedIn

We estimate a measure of well-being efficiency that assesses countries’ ability to transform inputs into subjective well-being (Cantril ladder). We use the six inputs (real GDP per capita, healthy life expectancy, social support, freedom of choice, absence of corruption, and generosity) identified in the World Happiness Reports and apply Data Envelopment Analysis to a sample of 126 countries. Efficiency scores reveal that high ranking subjective well-being countries, such as the Nordic countries, are not strictly the most efficient ones. Also, the scores are uncorrelated with a traditional (total factor) measure of economic efficiency. This suggests that the implicit assumption that economic efficiency promotes wellbeing is not supported. Subjective well-being efficiency can be improved by changing the amount (scale) or composition of inputs and their use (technical efficiency). For instance, countries with lower unemployment, and greater healthy life expectancy and optimism are more efficient.

Nous estimons une mesure de l’efficience du bien-être qui évalue la capacité des pays à transformer les intrants en bien-être subjectif (échelle de Cantril). Nous utilisons les six intrants (PIB réel par habitant, espérance de vie en bonne santé, soutien social, liberté de choix, absence de corruption et générosité) identifiés dans les Rapports mondiaux sur le bonheur et appliquons l’analyse par enveloppement des données à un échantillon de 126 pays. Les scores d’efficience révèlent que les pays les mieux classés en matière de bien-être subjectif, comme les pays nordiques, ne sont pas strictement les plus efficients. De plus, les scores ne sont pas corrélés avec une mesure traditionnelle de l’efficience économique (PMF), ce qui suggère que l’hypothèse implicite selon laquelle l’efficience économique favorise le bien-être n’est pas étayée.

[Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-43-2-Sarracino-O_Connor.pdf)
