---
canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-33/recent-trends-in-europes-output-and-productivity-growth-performance-at-the-sector-level-2002-2015/"
title: "Recent Trends in Europe&#8217;s Output and Productivity Growth Performance at the Sector Level, 2002-2015"
author:
  name: "CSLS"
  url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/"
date_published: "2026-07-13T07:42:36+00:00"
date_modified: "2026-07-13T07:42:36+00:00"
post_type: "ipm"
summary: ""
ipm_issue_period:
  - "Fall 2017"
ipm_keyword:
  - "2002-2015"
  - "EU KLEMS"
  - "Europe"
  - "financial crisis"
  - "manufacturing"
  - "market services"
  - "output"
  - "productivity"
  - "sector-level"
ipm_research_theme:
  - "Productivity trends and comparisons"
ipm_country_focus:
  - "Europe"
  - "International"
  - "United States"
featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp"
status: "publish"
---

# Recent Trends in Europe’s Output and Productivity Growth Performance at the Sector Level, 2002-2015

Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-33/recent-trends-in-europes-output-and-productivity-growth-performance-at-the-sector-level-2002-2015/

# Recent Trends in Europe’s Output and Productivity Growth Performance at the Sector Level, 2002-2015

[Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-33-2-van-Ark-Jager.pdf)

Cite this article

×
Cite this article as:

van Ark, Bart, and Kirsten Jäger. 2017. “Recent Trends in Europe’s Output and Productivity Growth Performance at the Sector Level, 2002-2015.” International Productivity Monitor, No. 33 (Fall 2017): 8–23. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-33/recent-trends-in-europes-output-and-productivity-growth-performance-at-the-sector-level-2002-2015/

## Authors:

-
Bart van Ark
University of Manchester / The Productivity Institute

-
Kirsten Jäger
The Conference Board; University of Groningen

## IPM Issue 33

Fall 2017 pp. 8–23

## Related IPM articles

[The Relationship between Efficiencies Defenses for Mergers and TFP Growth

Robin Shaban

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 82–102](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-relationship-between-efficiencies-defenses-for-mergers-and-tfp-growth/)
[Adult Skills and Productivity: New Evidence from PIAAC 2023

Dan Andrews, Balázs Égert, Christine de La Maisonneuve

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 41–63](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/adult-skills-and-productivity-new-evidence-from-piaac-2023/)

[The Potential Impact of Pro-competitive Regulatory Reforms on Productivity and Growth in Canada

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 3–40](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-potential-impact-of-pro-competitive-regulatory-reforms-on-productivity-and-growth-in-canada/)
[De-industrialization and the Great Productivity Slowdown: What Comes Next?

Paul Fisher

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 115–138](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/de-industrialization-and-the-great-productivity-slowdown-what-comes-next/)

[Appendix: UK Productivity Growth Rates Across Data Vintages and Studies

Josh Martin

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 65–73](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/appendix-uk-productivity-growth-rates-across-data-vintages-and-studies/)
[Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Productivity

Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Katharina Laengle, Matthias Schief, Filiz Unsal

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–26](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/opportunities-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-for-productivity/)

[Using Ecosystem Accounting to Integrate the Environment in Measures of Multifactor Productivity

Carl Obst

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 87–108](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/using-ecosystem-accounting-to-integrate-the-environment-in-measures-of-multifactor-productivity/)
[Eroding Natural Capital: An Alternative Explanation for the Secular Decline in Productivity Growth

Christina Caron

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 109–147](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/eroding-natural-capital-an-alternative-explanation-for-the-secular-decline-in-productivity-growth/)

[How Does Industrial Policy Impact Output, Hours and Productivity? The Canadian Experience

Tim Sargent

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 39–53](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/how-does-industrial-policy-impact-output-hours-and-productivity-the-canadian-experience/)
[Climate Change and Productivity — An Exploration

Dirk Pilat

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 54–86](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/climate-change-and-productivity-an-exploration/)

## Abstract

## Résumé

EN
FR

Copy link

Email

LinkedIn

Using the latest release of sector-level growth and productivity data up to 2015 from the EU KLEMS database, evidence is mounting that the global financial crisis (2008/09) and the Euro Area recession (2011/12) have significantly damaged the growth potential of European economies across the board. None of the countries in the 12 EU member states included in the analysis have recovered to growth rates anywhere near to what they were in the decade before the crisis. Slow productivity growth which was already visible in most market services sectors before the crisis has broadened to the goods-producing sector for most European economies since the crisis. The manufacturing sector was particularly hard hit, and has only partially recovered. The dynamics of the global and Euro Area crises and their impact seem still to be in full swing, making it too early to judge whether output and productivity growth rates can still recover to the pre-crises rate or whether growth in Europe will end up as a slower long-term trend. Despite recent modest improvements in

À l’aide de la dernière diffusion de données de croissance et de productivité au niveau sectoriel jusqu’en 2015 provenant de la base de données EU KLEMS, les données probantes s’accumulent que la crise financière mondiale (2008-2009) et la récession de la zone euro (2011-2012) ont considérablement endommagé le potentiel de croissance des économies européennes dans l’ensemble. Aucun des 12 États membres de l’UE inclus dans l’analyse n’a retrouvé des taux de croissance proches de ceux de la décennie précédant la crise. La faible croissance de la productivité, déjà visible dans la plupart des secteurs de services marchands avant la crise, s’est étendue au secteur des biens pour la plupart des économies européennes depuis la crise.

[Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-33-2-van-Ark-Jager.pdf)
