--- canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-30/are-gdp-and-productivity-measures-up-to-the-challenges-of-the-digital-economy/" title: "Are GDP and Productivity Measures Up to the Challenges of the Digital Economy?" author: name: "CSLS" url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/" date_published: "2026-07-13T07:40:49+00:00" date_modified: "2026-07-13T07:40:49+00:00" post_type: "ipm" summary: "" ipm_issue_period: - "Spring 2016" ipm_keyword: - "AirBnB" - "digital economy" - "e-commerce" - "GDP" - "intellectual property" - "measurement" - "OECD" - "peer-to-peer" - "prices" - "Uber" ipm_research_theme: - "Measurement and methodology" ipm_country_focus: - "International" - "OECD" - "United States" featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp" status: "publish" --- # Are GDP and Productivity Measures Up to the Challenges of the Digital Economy? Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-30/are-gdp-and-productivity-measures-up-to-the-challenges-of-the-digital-economy/ # Are GDP and Productivity Measures Up to the Challenges of the Digital Economy? [Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-30-1-Ahmad-Schreyer.pdf) Cite this article × Cite this article as: Ahmad, Nadim, and Paul Schreyer. 2016. “Are GDP and Productivity Measures Up to the Challenges of the Digital Economy?” International Productivity Monitor, No. 30 (Spring 2016): 4–27. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-30/are-gdp-and-productivity-measures-up-to-the-challenges-of-the-digital-economy/ ## Authors: - Nadim Ahmad OECD - Paul Schreyer OECD ## IPM Issue 30 Spring 2016 pp. 4–27 ## Related IPM articles [Is the SNA Still Useful? A Review Article on The Measure of Progress: Counting What Really Matters Paul Schreyer Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 116–124](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/is-the-sna-still-useful-a-review-article-on-the-measure-of-progress-counting-what-really-matters/) [Adult Skills and Productivity: New Evidence from PIAAC 2023 Dan Andrews, Balázs Égert, Christine de La Maisonneuve Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 41–63](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/adult-skills-and-productivity-new-evidence-from-piaac-2023/) [The Potential Impact of Pro-competitive Regulatory Reforms on Productivity and Growth in Canada Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 3–40](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-potential-impact-of-pro-competitive-regulatory-reforms-on-productivity-and-growth-in-canada/) [IPM Issue 49 Editors’ Overview Andrew Sharpe, Bart van Ark, Paul Schreyer Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 1–2](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/) [The Challenges of Productivity Measurement — Review Article on The Measure of Economies: Measuring Productivity in an Age of Technological Change Chad Syverson Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 139–143](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/the-challenges-of-productivity-measurement-review-article-on-the-measure-of-economies-measuring-productivity-in-an-age-of-technological-change/) [New Measures of Public Service Productivity: Lessons and Results from the United Kingdom Richard Heys Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 90–114](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/new-measures-of-public-service-productivity-lessons-and-results-from-the-united-kingdom/) [The UK Productivity Slowdown: A Review of Timing, Magnitude, and Drivers Josh Martin Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–34](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/the-uk-productivity-slowdown-a-review-of-timing-magnitude-and-drivers/) [Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Productivity Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Katharina Laengle, Matthias Schief, Filiz Unsal Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–26](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/opportunities-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-for-productivity/) [Climate Change and Productivity — An Exploration Dirk Pilat Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 54–86](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/climate-change-and-productivity-an-exploration/) [Could Domestic Industrial Policies, Even With Global Fragmentation, Revive Productivity? Catherine Mann Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 3–19](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/could-domestic-industrial-policies-even-with-global-fragmentation-revive-productivity/) ## Abstract ## Résumé EN FR Copy link Email LinkedIn Recent years have seen a rapid emergence of disruptive technologies with new forms of intermediation, service provision and consumption, with digitalization being a common characteristic. These include new platforms that facilitate peer-to-peer transactions, such as AirBnB and Uber, new activities such as crowd sourcing, a growing category of the ‘occasional self-employed’ and prevalence of ‘free’ media services, funded by advertising and ‘Big data’. Against a backdrop of slowing rates of measured productivity growth, this has raised questions about the conceptual basis of GDP, and whether current compilation methods are adequate. This article frames the discussion under an umbrella of the Digitalized Economy, covering also statistical challenges where digitalization is a complicating feature such as the measurement of international transactions and knowledgebased assets. It delineates between conceptual and compilation issues and highlights areas where further investigations are merited. The overall conclusion is that, on balance, the accounting framework for GDP looks to be up to the challenges posed by digitalization. Many practical measurement issues remain, however, in particular concerning price changes and where digitalization meets internationalization. “The digital economy now permeates countless aspects of the world economy, impacting sectors as varied as banking, retail, energy, transportation, education, publishing, media or health. Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are transforming the ways social interactions and personal relationships are conducted, with fixed, mobile and broadcast networks converging, and devices and objects increasingly connected to form the Internet of Things.” (OECD, 2015a:11) THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 2 is everywhere Ces dernières années ont vu l’émergence rapide de technologies perturbatrices avec de nouvelles formes d’intermédiation, de prestation de services et de consommation, la numérisation étant une caractéristique commune. Celles-ci comprennent de nouvelles plateformes facilitant les transactions entre pairs, comme AirBnB et Uber, de nouvelles activités comme le financement participatif, une catégorie croissante de « travailleurs autonomes occasionnels » et la prévalence de services médiatiques « gratuits » financés par la publicité et les mégadonnées. Dans un contexte de ralentissement des taux de croissance mesurée de la productivité, cela a soulevé des questions sur les bases conceptuelles du PIB et sur l’adéquation des méthodes actuelles de compilation. Cet article cadre la discussion sous l’ombrelle de l’économie numérique, couvrant également les défis statistiques où la numérisation est un facteur compliquant, comme la mesure des transactions internationales et des actifs fondés sur le savoir. [Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-30-1-Ahmad-Schreyer.pdf)