---
canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-27/priorities-and-directions-for-future-productivity-research-an-oecd-perspective/"
title: "Priorities and Directions for Future Productivity Research: An OECD Perspective"
author:
  name: "CSLS"
  url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/"
date_published: "2026-07-13T07:37:54+00:00"
date_modified: "2026-07-13T07:37:54+00:00"
post_type: "ipm"
summary: ""
ipm_issue_period:
  - "Fall 2014"
ipm_keyword:
  - "education"
  - "globalization"
  - "health"
  - "intellectual property"
  - "land"
  - "measurement"
  - "MFP"
  - "OECD"
  - "productivity research"
  - "sub-soil assets"
ipm_research_theme:
  - "Measurement and methodology"
ipm_country_focus:
  - "International"
  - "OECD"
featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp"
status: "publish"
---

# Priorities and Directions for Future Productivity Research: An OECD Perspective

Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-27/priorities-and-directions-for-future-productivity-research-an-oecd-perspective/

# Priorities and Directions for Future Productivity Research: An OECD Perspective

[Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-27-1-Schreyer.pdf)

Cite this article

×
Cite this article as:

Schreyer, Paul. 2014. “Priorities and Directions for Future Productivity Research: An OECD Perspective.” International Productivity Monitor, No. 27 (Fall 2014): 7–9. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-27/priorities-and-directions-for-future-productivity-research-an-oecd-perspective/

## Author:

-
Paul Schreyer
OECD

## IPM Issue 27

Fall 2014 pp. 7–9

## Related IPM articles

[Is the SNA Still Useful? A Review Article on The Measure of Progress: Counting What Really Matters

Paul Schreyer

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 116–124](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/is-the-sna-still-useful-a-review-article-on-the-measure-of-progress-counting-what-really-matters/)
[Adult Skills and Productivity: New Evidence from PIAAC 2023

Dan Andrews, Balázs Égert, Christine de La Maisonneuve

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 41–63](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/adult-skills-and-productivity-new-evidence-from-piaac-2023/)

[The Potential Impact of Pro-competitive Regulatory Reforms on Productivity and Growth in Canada

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 3–40](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-potential-impact-of-pro-competitive-regulatory-reforms-on-productivity-and-growth-in-canada/)
[The UK Productivity Slowdown: A Review of Timing, Magnitude, and Drivers

Josh Martin

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–34](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/the-uk-productivity-slowdown-a-review-of-timing-magnitude-and-drivers/)

[Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Productivity

Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Katharina Laengle, Matthias Schief, Filiz Unsal

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–26](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/opportunities-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-for-productivity/)
[Using Ecosystem Accounting to Integrate the Environment in Measures of Multifactor Productivity

Carl Obst

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 87–108](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/using-ecosystem-accounting-to-integrate-the-environment-in-measures-of-multifactor-productivity/)

[Eroding Natural Capital: An Alternative Explanation for the Secular Decline in Productivity Growth

Christina Caron

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 109–147](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/eroding-natural-capital-an-alternative-explanation-for-the-secular-decline-in-productivity-growth/)
[Climate Change and Productivity — An Exploration

Dirk Pilat

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 54–86](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/climate-change-and-productivity-an-exploration/)

[Could Domestic Industrial Policies, Even With Global Fragmentation, Revive Productivity?

Catherine Mann

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 3–19](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/could-domestic-industrial-policies-even-with-global-fragmentation-revive-productivity/)
[Employment, Output and Productivity Adjustment During the Great Recession: The Role of Managerial Quality

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Jacques Mairesse, Giuseppe Nicoletti

Spring 2024 | IPM Issue 46 | pp. 101–108](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-46/employment-output-and-productivity-adjustment-during-the-great-recession-the-role-of-managerial-quality/)

## Abstract

## Résumé

EN
FR

Copy link

Email

LinkedIn

This article puts forward three priority areas for future productivity research. It first identifies important data gaps related to non-produced, non-financial assets such as land and sub-soil assets as the exclusion of these assets can lead to biased multifactor productivity growth estimates. It then highlights the health and education sectors as a focus for future productivity research, given the challenges of capturing quality change in these sectors as well as the public provision of much of the output and absence of market prices. Finally, it points out that research is needed on the implications of globalization on productivity measurement, giving the example of intellectual property, which is produced in one country, but used in many. P RODUCTIVITY CHANGE AND ITS MEASURE –

Cet article met en avant trois domaines prioritaires pour les futures recherches en productivité. Il cerne d’abord d’importantes lacunes dans les données liées aux actifs non produits et non financiers tels que les terres et les actifs du sous-sol, dont l’exclusion peut conduire à des estimations biaisées de la croissance de la productivité multifactorielle. Il met ensuite en évidence les secteurs de la santé et de l’éducation comme axes de futures recherches en productivité, compte tenu des difficultés à saisir les changements de qualité dans ces secteurs ainsi que la fourniture publique d’une grande partie de la production et l’absence de prix de marché. Enfin, il souligne que des recherches sont nécessaires sur les implications de la mondialisation pour la mesure de la productivité, en donnant l’exemple de la propriété intellectuelle, qui est produite dans un pays mais utilisée dans plusieurs.

[Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-27-1-Schreyer.pdf)
