---
canonical_url: "https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-11/fixing-fiscal-federalism-to-improve-canadas-productivity-performance/"
title: "Fixing Fiscal Federalism to Improve Canada&#8217;s Productivity Performance"
author:
  name: "CSLS"
  url: "https://csls.ca/author/cslc/"
date_published: "2026-07-13T06:53:26+00:00"
date_modified: "2026-07-13T06:53:26+00:00"
post_type: "ipm"
summary: ""
ipm_issue_period:
  - "Fall 2005"
ipm_keyword:
  - "Canada"
  - "capital investment"
  - "competitiveness"
  - "employment insurance"
  - "fiscal federalism"
  - "interprovincial transfers"
  - "productivity"
  - "tax reform"
  - "urbanization"
ipm_research_theme:
  - "Policy and institutions"
ipm_country_focus:
  - "Canada"
  - "United States"
featured_image: "https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IPM_50_banner.webp"
status: "publish"
---

# Fixing Fiscal Federalism to Improve Canada’s Productivity Performance

Canonical URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-11/fixing-fiscal-federalism-to-improve-canadas-productivity-performance/

# Fixing Fiscal Federalism to Improve Canada’s Productivity Performance

[Download full PDF article](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-11-3-Milway.pdf)

Cite this article

×
Cite this article as:

Milway, James. 2005. “Fixing Fiscal Federalism to Improve Canada’s Productivity Performance.” International Productivity Monitor, No. 11 (Fall 2005): 14–20. https://www.csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-11/fixing-fiscal-federalism-to-improve-canadas-productivity-performance/

## Author:

-
James Milway
Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity, Ontario

## IPM Issue 11

Fall 2005 pp. 14–20

## Related IPM articles

[The Relationship between Efficiencies Defenses for Mergers and TFP Growth

Robin Shaban

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 82–102](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-relationship-between-efficiencies-defenses-for-mergers-and-tfp-growth/)
[Appendix: Variable Definitions and Country/Sector Coverage for Regulatory Reform Analysis

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 1–18](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/appendix-variable-definitions-and-country-sector-coverage-for-regulatory-reform-analysis/)

[Adult Skills and Productivity: New Evidence from PIAAC 2023

Dan Andrews, Balázs Égert, Christine de La Maisonneuve

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 41–63](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/adult-skills-and-productivity-new-evidence-from-piaac-2023/)
[The Potential Impact of Pro-competitive Regulatory Reforms on Productivity and Growth in Canada

Gilbert Cette, Jimmy Lopez, Giuseppe Nicoletti, Océane Vernerey

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 3–40](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/the-potential-impact-of-pro-competitive-regulatory-reforms-on-productivity-and-growth-in-canada/)

[IPM Issue 49 Editors’ Overview

Andrew Sharpe, Bart van Ark, Paul Schreyer

Fall 2025 | IPM Issue 49 | pp. 1–2](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/)
[Appendix: UK Productivity Growth Rates Across Data Vintages and Studies

Josh Martin

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 65–73](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/appendix-uk-productivity-growth-rates-across-data-vintages-and-studies/)

[Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence for Productivity

Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Katharina Laengle, Matthias Schief, Filiz Unsal

Spring 2025 | IPM Issue 48 | pp. 1–26](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-48/opportunities-and-risks-of-artificial-intelligence-for-productivity/)
[Using Ecosystem Accounting to Integrate the Environment in Measures of Multifactor Productivity

Carl Obst

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 87–108](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/using-ecosystem-accounting-to-integrate-the-environment-in-measures-of-multifactor-productivity/)

[Eroding Natural Capital: An Alternative Explanation for the Secular Decline in Productivity Growth

Christina Caron

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 109–147](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/eroding-natural-capital-an-alternative-explanation-for-the-secular-decline-in-productivity-growth/)
[How Does Industrial Policy Impact Output, Hours and Productivity? The Canadian Experience

Tim Sargent

Fall 2024 | IPM Issue 47 | pp. 39–53](https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-47/how-does-industrial-policy-impact-output-hours-and-productivity-the-canadian-experience/)

## Abstract

## Résumé

EN
FR

Copy link

Email

LinkedIn

This article argues that Canada’s system of fiscal federalism, which results in large interprovincial transfers from have to have-not provinces, promotes consumption over investment and therefore fails to maximize Canada’s productivity potential. The author attributes Canada’s widening prosperity gap with the United States primarily to lower urbanization, lower cluster intensity, lower educational attainment, and lower capital investment. Policy recommendations include reforming Employment Insurance into a true insurance program, removing its interprovincial transfer elements, and shifting the tax system from business income to consumption.

Cet article soutient que le système de fédéralisme fiscal du Canada, qui entraîne d’importants transferts interprovinciaux des provinces riches vers les provinces pauvres, favorise la consommation au détriment de l’investissement et ne maximise donc pas le potentiel de productivité du Canada. L’auteur attribue le creusement de l’écart de prospérité du Canada avec les États-Unis principalement à un taux d’urbanisation plus faible, une intensité de grappes industrielles plus faible, un niveau de scolarité plus bas et un investissement en capital plus faible. Les recommandations politiques comprennent la réforme de l’assurance-emploi en un véritable programme d’assurance, la suppression de ses éléments de transfert interprovincial et le déplacement du système fiscal du revenu des entreprises vers la consommation.

[Download full PDF](https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-11-3-Milway.pdf)
